%0 Journal Article
%A Motes-Rodrigo, Alba
%A McPherron, Shannon P.
%A Archer, Will
%A Hernandez-Aguilar, R. Adriana
%A Tennie, Claudio
%+ Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
%T Experimental investigation of orangutans’ lithic percussive and sharp stone tool behaviours : 
%G eng
%U https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-8FC3-9
%R 10.1371/journal.pone.0263343
%7 2022-02-16
%D 2022
%8 16.02.2022
%* Review method: peer-reviewed
%X Early stone tools, and in particular sharp stone tools, arguably represent one of the most important technological milestones in human evolution. The production and use of sharp stone tools significantly widened the ecological niche of our ancestors, allowing them to exploit novel food resources. However, despite their importance, it is still unclear how these early lithic technologies emerged and which behaviours served as stepping-stones for the development of systematic lithic production in our lineage. One approach to answer this question is to collect comparative data on the stone tool making and using abilities of our closest living relatives, the great apes, to reconstruct the potential stone-related behaviours of early hominins. To this end, we tested both the individual and the social learning abilities of five orangutans to make and use stone tools. Although the orangutans did not make sharp stone tools initially, three individuals spontaneously engaged in lithic percussion, and sharp stone pieces were produced under later experimental conditions. Furthermore, when provided with a human-made sharp stone, one orangutan spontaneously used it as a cutting tool. Contrary to previous experiments, social demonstrations did not considerably improve the stone tool making and using abilities of orangutans. Our study is the first to systematically investigate the stone tool making and using abilities of untrained, unenculturated orangutans showing that two proposed pre-requisites for the emergence of early lithic technologies–lithic percussion and the recognition of sharp-edged stones as cutting tools–are present in this species. We discuss the implications that ours and previous great ape stone tool experiments have for understanding the initial stages of lithic technologies in our lineage.
%K Orangutans, Paleoanthropology, Apes, Archaeology, Primates, Tendons, Lithic technology, Silicones
%J PLOS ONE
%V 17
%] e0263343
%I Public Library of Science (PLoS)
%@ 1932-6203