% pubman genre = article @article{item_2444943, title = {{Lithic production strategies in the Middle Paleolithic of the southern Balkans}}, author = {Dogandzic, Tamara and Duricic, L.}, language = {eng}, issn = {1040-6182}, doi = {10.1016/j.quaint.2017.03.011}, publisher = {Pergamon}, address = {Oxford}, year = {2017}, date = {2017-09-02}, abstract = {{One of the major challenges in Paleolithic research is disentangling various factors that contributed to variation in Neandertal technological behavior. As a result of variable abundance of the Paleolithic record across Eurasia, our understanding of regional and temporal patters of Middle Paleolithic industries differs from one region to another. Southeastern Europe is one of the areas that stands in contrast to rich and thoroughly investigated regions of other parts of Europe. A few sites in the region, nevertheless, offer an opportunity for the study of technological behavior of Middle Paleolithic hominins. The rockshelter sites of Crvena stijena and Bio{\v{c}}e in Montenegro, located on the eastern Adriatic coast in the Mediterranean zone, have relatively dense remains of hominin occupations compared to other sites in the Balkan peninsula. Previous research identified several characteristics of the eastern Adriatic industries. Firstly, they have been characterized as Micromousterian due to the small average size of the artifacts, a feature that potentially results from the size of the local raw material. On typological grounds, some assemblages have been said to show typological similarity to Charentian, and some researchers have emphasized frequent denticulate tools as a late Mousterian feature. In this study we aim to examine lithic production strategies at the two sites based on samples from Crvena stijena deposits that tentatively range from late MIS 5 to MIS 3 and from the still undated upper sequence of Bio{\v{c}}e. We will evaluate variability in the industries in the Adriatic region by looking at both the process of blank production and further tool production and consumption to provide a clearer picture of lithic production strategies during the late Middle Paleolithic. We will address the issue of how raw material affects the structure of these assemblages, artifact size, and particularly diachronic patterns of stone tool production strategies.}}, journal = {{Quaternary International}}, volume = {450}, pages = {68--102}, }