% pubman genre = article
@article{item_3332561,
title = {{Towards a standardized annotation of rhyme judgments in Chinese historical phonology (and beyond)}},
author = {List, Johann-Mattis and Hill, Nathan W. and Foster, Christopher J.},
language = {eng},
issn = {1998-6769},
doi = {10.31826/jlr-2019-171-207},
publisher = {RGGU},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
abstract = {{Although rhyme analysis plays a crucial role in the reconstruction of Old Chinese phonology,{\textless}br{\textgreater}the field has not yet developed a standardized annotation framework for rhyme judgments{\textless}br{\textgreater}applied to Ancient Chinese texts. Building on initial attempts to standardize crosslinguistic{\textless}br{\textgreater}data for the purpose of historical and typological language comparison (as part of{\textless}br{\textgreater}the Cross-Linguistic Data Formats initiative), we present a proposal for consistent and transparent{\textless}br{\textgreater}rhyme annotation. This proposal allows scholars to annotate the rhymes they identify{\textless}br{\textgreater}in historical texts in such a way that the judgments can be analyzed with computational tools{\textless}br{\textgreater}as well as conveniently inspected by scholars. Our framework is accompanied by software{\textless}br{\textgreater}tools and exemplary datasets, which were annotated by various scholars, and reflect not only{\textless}br{\textgreater}Chinese, but also contemporary poetry in different languages. In the paper, we present the{\textless}br{\textgreater}framework and also point to caveats and current insufficiencies in annotation. In doing so,{\textless}br{\textgreater}we hope to inspire more scholars working on Old Chinese reconstruction to share their{\textless}br{\textgreater}judgments, allowing others working in the field to improve, revise, and analyze them.}},
journal = {{Journal of Language Relationship}},
volume = {17},
number = {1},
pages = {26--43},
}