% pubman genre = article
@article{item_3552372,
title = {{Variation and covariation of external shape and cross{-}sectional geometry in the human metacarpus}},
author = {Tanner, Samuel B. and Bardo, Ameline and Davies, Thomas W. and Dunmore, Christopher J. and Johnston, Richard E. and Owen, Nicholas J. and Kivell, Tracy L. and Skinner, Matthew M.},
language = {eng},
issn = {2692-7691},
doi = {10.1002/ajpa.24866},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-02},
abstract = {{Objectives: Analyses of external bone shape using geometric morphometrics (GM) and cross-sectional geometry (CSG) are frequently employed to investigate bone structural variation and reconstruct activity in the past. However, the association between these methods has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we analyze whole bone shape and CSG variation of metacarpals 1{\textendash}5 and test covariation between them. Materials and Methods: We analyzed external metacarpal shape using GM and CSG of the diaphysis at three locations in metacarpals 1{\textendash}5. The study sample includes three modern human groups: crew from the shipwrecked Mary Rose (n {\textequals} 35 metacarpals), a Pre-industrial group (n {\textequals} 50), and a Post-industrial group (n {\textequals} 31). We tested group differences in metacarpal shape and CSG, as well as correlations between these two aspects of metacarpal bone structure. Results: GM analysis demonstrated metacarpus external shape variation is predominately related to changes in diaphyseal width and articular surface size. Differences in external shape were found between the non-pollical metacarpals of the Mary Rose and Pre-industrial groups and between the third metacarpals of the Pre- and Post-industrial groups. CSG results suggest the Mary Rose and Post-industrial groups have stronger metacarpals than the Pre-industrial group. Correlating CSG and external shape showed significant relationships between increasing external robusticity and biomechanical strength across non-pollical metacarpals (r: 0.815{\textendash}0.535; p $\leq$ 0.05). Discussion: Differences in metacarpal cortical structure and external shape between human groups suggest differences in the type and frequency of manual activities. Combining these results with studies of entheses and kinematics of the hand will improve reconstructions of manual behavior in the past. {\copyright} 2023 The Authors. American Journal of Biological Anthropology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.}},
journal = {{American Journal of Biological Anthropology}},
volume = {183},
number = {2},
eid = {e24866},
}