% pubman genre = article
@article{item_3653547,
title = {{Call for new criteria for monitoring and registering Natura 2000 species data (advance online)}},
author = {Genovart, Meritxell and Salguero{-}Gomez, Roberto and Colchero, Fernando and Guil, Francisco and Rabassa{-}Juvanteny, Joan and Uriach{-}Dasca, Julia and Conde, Dalia Amor and Gaillard, Jean Michel and Coulson, Tim},
language = {eng},
issn = {0888-8892; 1523-1739},
doi = {10.1111/cobi.70064},
year = {2025},
abstract = {{The European Union{\textquotesingle}s Birds and Habitats Directives are intended to guarantee the persistence of species and natural habitats across member states. To achieve this laudable aim, the Natura 2000 network of protected areas was established in 1992. Since then, member states are required to regularly monitor species and habitats and report findings to the European Commission, which requires substantial investment from all countries. The Natura 2000 network is an invaluable example of a large-scale coordinated network developed to address major conservation issues. Based on our analysis of the 2020 Species Natura 2000 database and on expert opinions by Natura 2000 executives, we found that the network is failing to adequately show biodiversity status and guide conservation because it does not allow cross-border comparisons of species{\textquoteright} and populations{\textquoteright} conservation status. The main contributing factor to this failure is that member states frequently fail to follow reporting EU guidelines, resulting in heterogeneity in criteria for monitoring and registering species among Natura 2000 areas. We advocate developing new unified and realistic criteria for monitoring and reporting species data that correctly allow cross-border comparisons and conservation diagnosis. We propose that monitoring protocols and current criteria be modified slightly by considering species{\textquoteright} life-history strategies, distribution, and conservation status. We do not suggest a major overhaul of the directives; rather, we propose debate on how relatively small changes in guidelines could improve the utility of the huge amount of data collected from the Natura 2000 network.}},
journal = {{Conservation Biology}},
eid = {e70064},
}