%0 Journal Article
%A Page, Abigail E.
%A Ringen, Erik J.
%A Koster, Jeremy
%A Borgerhoff Mulder, Monique
%A Kramer, Karen
%A Shenk, Mary K.
%A Stieglitz, Jonathan
%A Starkweather, Kathrine
%A Ziker, John P.
%A Boyette, Adam H.
%A Colleran, Heidi
%A Moya, Cristina
%A Du, Juan
%A Mattison, Siobhán M.
%A Greaves, Russell
%A Sum, Chun-Yi
%A Liu, Ruizhe
%A Lew-Levy, Sheina
%A Kiabiya Ntamboudila, Francy
%A Prall, Sean
%A Towner, Mary C.
%A Blumenfield, Tami
%A Migliano, Andrea B.
%A Major-Smith, Daniel
%A Dyble, Mark
%A Salali, Gul Deniz
%A Chaudhary, Nikhil
%A Derkx, Inez E.
%A Ross, Cody T.
%A Scelza, Brooke A.
%A Gurven, Michael D.
%A Winterhalder, Bruce P.
%A Cortez, Carmen
%A Pacheco-Cobos, Luis
%A Schacht, Ryan
%A Macfarlan, Shane J.
%A Leonetti, Donna
%A French, Jennifer C.
%A Alam , Nurul
%A Zohora, Fatema tuz
%A Kaplan, Hillard S.
%A Hooper, Paul L.
%A Sear, Rebecca
%+ Department of Human Behavior Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Behavior Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Behavior Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Behavior Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
Department of Human Behavior Ecology and Culture, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society
%T Women's subsistence strategies predict fertility across cultures, but context matters : 
%G eng
%U https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-7B19-D
%R 10.1073/pnas.2318181121
%7 2024-02-12
%D 2024
%* Review method: peer-reviewed
%X While it is commonly assumed that farmers have higher, and foragers lower, fertility compared to populations practicing other forms of subsistence, robust supportive evi-dence is lacking. We tested whether subsistence activities—incorporating market inte-gration—are associated with fertility in 10,250 women from 27 small- scale societies and found considerable variation in fertility. This variation did not align with group- level subsistence typologies. Societies labeled as “farmers” did not have higher fertility than others, while “foragers” did not have lower fertility. However, at the individual level, we found strong evidence that fertility was positively associated with farming and moderate evidence of a negative relationship between foraging and fertility. Markers of market inte-gration were strongly negatively correlated with fertility. Despite strong cross- cultural evidence,  these  relationships  were  not  consistent  in  all  populations,  highlighting  the  importance of the socioecological context, which likely influences the diverse mecha-nisms driving the relationship between fertility and subsistence.
%K anthropological demography, cross-cultural analysis, demographic transition, fertility, subsistence-based populations
%J PNAS
%V 121
%N 9
%] e2318181121
%I National Academy of Sciences
%C Washington, D.C.
%@ 0027-8424