%0 Journal Article %A Donati, Georgina %A Edginton, Trudi %A Bardo, Ameline %A Kivell, Tracy L. %A Ballieux, Haiko %A Stamate, Cosmin %A Forrester, Gillian S. %+ Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Max Planck Society %T Motor-sensory biases are associated with cognitive and social abilities in humans : %G eng %U https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000F-8611-6 %R 10.1038/s41598-024-64372-2 %7 2024-07-02 %D 2024 %* Review method: peer-reviewed %X Across vertebrates, adaptive behaviors, like feeding and avoiding predators, are linked to lateralized brain function. The presence of the behavioral manifestations of these biases are associated with increased task success. Additionally, when an individual’s direction of bias aligns with the majority of the population, it is linked to social advantages. However, it remains unclear if behavioral biases in humans correlate with the same advantages. This large-scale study (N = 313–1661, analyses dependent) examines whether the strength and alignment of behavioral biases associate with cognitive and social benefits respectively in humans. To remain aligned with the animal literature, we evaluate motor-sensory biases linked to motor-sequencing and emotion detection to assess lateralization. Results reveal that moderate hand lateralization is positively associated with task success and task success is, in turn, associated with language fluency, possibly representing a cascade effect. Additionally, like other vertebrates, the majority of our human sample possess a ‘standard’ laterality profile (right hand bias, left visual bias). A ‘reversed’ profile is rare by comparison, and associates higher self-reported social difficulties and increased rate of autism and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. We highlight the importance of employing a comparative theoretical framing to illuminate how and why different laterization profiles associate with diverging social and cognitive phenotypes. © The Author(s) 2024. %K Human behaviour, Social behaviour %J Scientific Reports %V 14 %] 14724 %I Nature Publishing Group %C London, UK %@ 2045-2322